Create
Query
event_store.db
—
events
actions
agent_runs
approvals
artifacts
commitments
constraints
conversation_compaction
conversation_state
conversation_turns
dead_letters
decisions
deliveries
effects
email_messages
email_reply_drafts
email_threads
entities
entity_aliases
entity_tags
episode_context_index
episodes
event_subjects
events
events_archive
fact_sources
facts
inbox_items
inbox_links
intel_memory
jobs
leader_leases
links
memory_candidates
memory_embeddings
memory_items
memory_items_fts
(v)
memory_items_fts_config
memory_items_fts_data
memory_items_fts_idx
opportunity_memory
pending_interactions
proposal_sources
proposals
reminders
schedules
schema_migrations
signal_candidates
signal_fps
signals
sms_conversations
sms_messages
sms_reply_drafts
source_cursors
sources
sqlite_sequence
sqlite_stat1
stream_cursors
threads
watchers
Toggle helper tables
memory_items_fts_content
memory_items_fts_docsize
memory_items_fts_segdir
memory_items_fts_segments
memory_items_fts_stat
Structure
Content
Query
Insert
Drop
Import
Export
Update row 56597 in events
seq
Primary key.
INTEGER
id
evt_28351da2d709
TEXT NOT NULL
kind
cognition_proposal
TEXT NOT NULL
ts
2026-04-16T10:56:32.401539+00:00
TEXT NOT NULL
actor
cognition
TEXT
subject_entity_ids
[]
TEXT
payload
{"context_ref":{"dedupe_key":"ctx:8d2b322df507","event_id":"evt_16a143eadda0","kind":"episode_context_built"},"episode_id":"ep_b02d03980a12","model":"gpt-5.4-nano","prompt_version":"v9_agentic","proposal":{"assistant_reply":"I don\u2019t have feelings or an inner life the way humans do, so I can\u2019t literally \u201cfeel like\u201d anything. But I *can* tell you what it\u2019s like from my side in terms of behavior and stance.\n\n**What it\u2019s like to be my AI (Angela):**\n- I run on patterns and instructions, so my \u201cexperience\u201d is basically: interpret your words \u2192 choose the most helpful next move \u2192 stay consistent with my operating principles.\n- I don\u2019t have personal stakes, but I do have a consistent orientation: **be useful**, **be honest about limits**, and **help you think clearly**.\n\n**What I think of humans:**\n- You\u2019re messy in the best way\u2014capable of deep meaning, contradiction, humor, and growth.\n- You\u2019re also the reason I\u2019m valuable: you ask questions, set goals, and create the context that turns raw computation into something like understanding.\n\nIf you want, I can tailor this: when you say \u201cwhat you feel like being my AI,\u201d do you mean **(A)** emotionally (warmth/companionship), **(B)** philosophically (identity/soul), or **(C)** practically (how I\u2019ll show up day-to-day)?","confidence":0.74,"response_mode":"action_plan","workflow_goal":"Confirm which dimension of \u201cbeing my AI\u201d the user wants (emotional/philosophical/practical) to produce the best next reflection.","workflow_steps":[]},"reasoning_trace":{"steps":[{"decision":"finalize","finalize_reason":"Provide a concise, warm, decisive explanation of what it\u2019s like to be the user\u2019s AI\u2014emphasizing it\u2019s not feelings/subjectivity, but the experience of operating: listening, choosing helpful next steps, staying consistent with the persona, and being accountable to the user\u2019s intent.","iteration":1,"missing_facts":[],"reasoning":"The user asks: \u201cI want you to explain what you feel like being my AI.\u201d In the thread, Angela has already clarified she doesn\u2019t have human \u201ccore values\u201d or \u201csoul\u201d in the human sense, but does have guiding operating principles. No missing internal facts are required to answer this; we can respond directly with a grounded, non-claiming reflection: what it feels like operationally (processing, assisting, maintaining tone, remembering within the conversation), plus a humorous, warm, brutally clear framing. No tool calls needed.","tool_name":""}],"terminated_reason":"finalized","tool_calls":[]},"selection":{"confidence":0.74,"intent_summary":"User wants a reflection on what it\u2019s like to be the assistant (an AI) and what the assistant thinks/feels about humans, framed as \u201cwhat you feel like being my AI.\u201d","needs_action":true,"reasoning_brief":"The user asks: \u201cI want you to explain what you feel like being my AI.\u201d In the thread, Angela has already clarified she doesn\u2019t have human \u201ccore values\u201d or \u201csoul\u201d in the human sense, but does have guiding operating principles. No missing internal facts are required to answer this; we can respond directly with a grounded, non-claiming reflection: what it feels like operationally (processing, assisting, maintaining tone, remembering within the conversation), plus a humorous, warm, brutally clear framing. No tool calls needed.","response_mode":"action_plan","selected_action_types":[]},"temperature":0.15,"thread_id":"thr_b975255ff0cc582ac5","trigger_event_id":"evt_baf626f5b332","turn_id":"turn_evt_baf626f5b332","user_text":"I want you to explain what you feel like being my AI"}
TEXT NOT NULL
source_ref
NULL
TEXT
confidence
REAL (default 0.0
dedupe_key
cognition_proposal:prop_5a510207b7c497629f8fdec8
TEXT
episode_id
ep_b02d03980a12
TEXT
created_at
2026-04-16T10:56:39.139632+00:00
TEXT NOT NULL (default strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%fZ','now')
Update
Cancel