Create
Query
event_store.db
—
events
actions
agent_runs
approvals
artifacts
attention_candidates
commitments
constraints
conversation_compaction
conversation_state
conversation_turns
dead_letters
decisions
deliveries
effects
email_messages
email_reply_drafts
email_threads
entities
entity_aliases
entity_tags
episode_context_index
episodes
event_subjects
events
events_archive
fact_sources
facts
inbox_items
inbox_links
intel_narrative_members
intel_narratives
jobs
leader_leases
links
memory_candidates
memory_embeddings
memory_items
memory_items_fts
(v)
memory_items_fts_config
memory_items_fts_data
memory_items_fts_idx
opportunity_memory
pending_interactions
proposal_sources
proposals
reminders
schedules
schema_migrations
signal_candidates
signal_fps
signals
sms_conversations
sms_messages
sms_reply_drafts
source_cursors
sources
sqlite_sequence
sqlite_stat1
stream_cursors
threads
watchers
Toggle helper tables
memory_items_fts_content
memory_items_fts_docsize
memory_items_fts_segdir
memory_items_fts_segments
memory_items_fts_stat
Structure
Content
Query
Insert
Drop
Import
Export
Update row 463484 in events
seq
Primary key.
INTEGER
id
evt_b8f79d2b8e66
TEXT NOT NULL
kind
artifact_upsert
TEXT NOT NULL
ts
2026-04-20T18:50:15.454259+00:00
TEXT NOT NULL
actor
intel_narratives
TEXT
subject_entity_ids
[]
TEXT
payload
{"artifact_id":"art_intel_narrative_nar_c5bbc69a3f661087_f1f8a6073024","evidence_event_ids":["evt_d57e8691cdc1","evt_63550abff9ba","evt_63550abff9ba","evt_63550abff9ba","evt_63550abff9ba","evt_63550abff9ba"],"kind":"intel_narrative","meta":{"confidence":0.65,"domains":["markets","energy","geopolitics"],"last_publish_at":"2026-04-20T18:50:15.451313+00:00","narrative_id":"nar_c5bbc69a3f661087","provenance":{"domain_types":[{"domain":"cnbc.com","type":"independent"},{"domain":"investopedia.com","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"investors.com","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"npr.org","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"stonex.com","type":"social"},{"domain":"wsj.com","type":"independent"}],"domains":["cnbc.com","investopedia.com","investors.com","npr.org","stonex.com","wsj.com"],"independent_confirmations":2,"primary_adjacent":0,"total_sources":6},"state":"live","tick_id":"tick_aea756419acc_1776710977","variant_labels":["risk-off equities, firmer oil","Strait of Hormuz supply shock fears","Iran escalation hits futures","markets reprice Gulf conflict risk"]},"output_json":{"confidence":0.65,"narrative_id":"nar_c5bbc69a3f661087","provenance":{"domain_types":[{"domain":"cnbc.com","type":"independent"},{"domain":"investopedia.com","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"investors.com","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"npr.org","type":"unknown"},{"domain":"stonex.com","type":"social"},{"domain":"wsj.com","type":"independent"}],"domains":["cnbc.com","investopedia.com","investors.com","npr.org","stonex.com","wsj.com"],"independent_confirmations":2,"primary_adjacent":0,"total_sources":6},"second_order_effects":["Higher oil can feed into near-term inflation expectations.","Risk-sensitive equities may remain vulnerable to further escalation headlines.","Energy-linked sectors may outperform relative to the broader market.","Volatility can stay elevated if shipping or military incidents continue.","Policy commentary may shift toward the macro impact of energy disruption risk."],"state":"live","title":"Markets are repricing Gulf conflict risk, but the signal is still headline-driven","uncertainty":"The key uncertainty is whether this is a temporary headline-driven wobble or the start of a more durable reassessment of Gulf supply risk. It is also unclear how much of the move reflects actual expectations of physical disruption versus a broader de-risking response to escalation language and military actions.","variant_labels":["risk-off equities, firmer oil","Strait of Hormuz supply shock fears","Iran escalation hits futures","markets reprice Gulf conflict risk"],"what_to_watch":["Whether oil prices continue to hold gains after the initial headline reaction.","Whether equity weakness broadens beyond a contained risk-off move.","Any evidence of shipping disruption, rerouting, or insurance stress in the Gulf.","Further U.S.-Iran military or diplomatic developments that change the probability of escalation.","Whether additional independent reporting confirms a sustained supply-risk repricing."],"whats_changed":"Compared with the prior state, the market response is now visible across both equities and energy, indicating that the conflict risk is being translated into prices rather than just discussed in headlines. The evidence base is still relatively thin and mostly news-snapshot driven, with only two independent confirmations, so the repricing is real but not yet strongly validated across a wide source set.","whats_happening":"Equities are softening while oil is firmer as investors react to renewed U.S.-Iran tensions and the possibility of disruption around the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. The move looks like a classic risk-premium adjustment: broader risk assets are under pressure, but losses remain contained rather than disorderly. That suggests markets are treating the situation as a near-term geopolitical shock with supply implications, not yet as a confirmed interruption to flows.","why_it_matters":"This matters because the Strait of Hormuz is a critical chokepoint for global energy flows, so even a partial repricing of disruption risk can spill beyond oil into equities, inflation expectations, and policy assumptions. If the market concludes that the tension is persistent, the effect is not limited to energy producers and consumers; it can alter the cost of capital and the risk appetite embedded in broader asset prices. For now, the market is signaling concern, but not yet a full conviction that supply will be materially impaired."},"ready_at":"2026-04-20T18:50:15.454259+00:00","status":"ready","summary":"Equities are softening while oil is firmer as investors react to renewed U.S.-Iran tensions and the possibility of disruption around the Gulf and Strait of Hormuz. The move looks like a classic risk-premium adjustment: broader risk assets are under pressure, but losses remain contained rather than disorderly. That suggests markets are treating the situation as a near-term geopolitical shock with","title":"Markets are repricing Gulf conflict risk, but the signal is still headline-driven","updated_at":"2026-04-20T18:50:15.454259+00:00"}
TEXT NOT NULL
source_ref
NULL
TEXT
confidence
REAL (default 0.0
dedupe_key
artifact_intel_narrative:art_intel_narrative_nar_c5bbc69a3f661087_f1f8a6073024
TEXT
episode_id
NULL
TEXT
created_at
2026-04-20T18:50:15.455531+00:00
TEXT NOT NULL (default strftime('%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%fZ','now')
Update
Cancel